Notes
Chapters
- A Fanatic Heart
- 27. Against the Grain
- 28. The Zemganno Brothers
- 29. Catch and Release
- 30. A Mercenary Frenzy
- 31. Le Paradou
- 32. The Sunflower and the Oleander
- 33. The Poet's Garden
- 34. Imaginary Savage
- 35. La Lutte
- 36. The Stranger
- 37. Two Roads
- 38. The Real South
- 39. Starry Night
- 40. The Isolated One
- 41. A Degenerate Child
- 42. The Garden and the Wheatfield
- 43. Illusions Fade, the Sublime Remains
- Ici Repose
The Early Years
The Dutch Years
The French Years
Chapters
Jo's report of the same evening presents an even more emotional bond between the young dealer and the old doctor: "Yesterday Dr. Gachet came to our house for a meal for the first time and Theo was highly determined that we should give him a very good welcome, because he has been so friendly to Vincent and Theo. The impression Vincent's death has made on him is striking -- he has not experienced anything like it since the death of his wife (20 years ago)." (b4307 V/1984, "Gogh-Bonger, Jo van" to "Bonger, H.C. en H.L.", 8/22/1890, quoted in Jansen and Robert, p. 46 [see also p. 59, n. 186].) That tears played a role in these evenings of remembrance is indicated more directly in a letter Theo wrote Dr. Gachet in September. Referring to the projected biography of Vincent by Aurier, Theo wrote: "He seems quite determined to write a book on the man for whom we are still weeping" (b2015 V/1982, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gachet, Paul", 9/12/1890).
Here is an extended sample of the kind of empty hagiographic comfort that Dr. Gachet offered -- and Theo eagerly accepted: "The more I think of it, the more I regard Vincent as a giant. Not a day goes by without my looking at his canvases. I always find a new idea in them, something different from the day before, and I return by the mental phenomenon of thought to the man himself whom I think of as a Colossus. ... He was, moreover, a philosopher of the same type as Seneca. This sovereign disdain that he felt for life which was surely a product of his passionate love for art, is extraordinarily suggestive. In my view, it was a sort of mental transposition in which the religious side of his character played an important role.The word love of art is not right -- Faith is the proper word. Faith to the point of martyrdom!!!! A strange idea has occurred to me that I will tell you of while putting a question mark after it. Had Vincent lived, it would still be years and years before the triumph of the art of humanity. His death however means a kind of consecration that results from the struggle between two opposing principles, light and darkness, life and death.I don't mean that he got the idea for his suicide from this or because of it, but he knew mankind and what man is worth and he must certainly have had moments when he glimpsed this idea of the void not in order to stay put in that place, but at least to entertain it energetically as offering some sort of certainty beyond death ... All this is so bizarre that I have to pull myself up short on this slope down which when I think of him (Vincent), he surely lures me." ("Gachet, Paul" to "Gogh, Theo van", 8/15/1890; quoted in Distel and Stein, p. 267.)
The tone of Dr. Gachet's "wisdom" on Vincent can be gleaned from a letter he wrote Theo in August 1890: "I think of [Vincent] as a Colossus. He was, moreover, aphilosopher of the same type as Seneca.This sovereign disdain that he felt for life which was surely a productof his passionate love for art, is extraordinarily suggestive." ("Gachet, Paul" to "Gogh, Theo van", 8/15/1890; quoted in Distel and Stein, p. 267; see Epilogue, n. 23.) There is not agenuine insight in this or anything else that remains of Dr. Gachet's "biographical"writing on Vincent. However, asVincent's first hagiographer, Dr. Gachet's fortunes (and hisson's) were the first to rise with Vincent's posthumouscelebrity. This trajectory was setat the funeral, when he presented himself to Theo as both a doctor and aprominent local figure -- that grail of Van Gogh family favor: "goodcompany." It isundoubtedly for these reasons (and because Dr. Gachet insisted that Vincent'sart showed his deep "Faith") that Theo shared Dr. Gachet's graveside "expressions of sympathy"for Vincent so lavishly with his mother and sister in Leiden (b2016 V/1982, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gachet, Paul", 8/12/1890; see Ch. 43, n. 194). (See b2850 V/1982, "Gogh-Carbentus, Anna C. van" to "Gogh, Theo en Jo van", 9/12/1890.)
Dr. Gachet provided rehabilitation of Vincent's reputation -- the only kind that Anna van Gogh recognized -- just at the moment of his death, when Theo (and his mother) needed it most. In Theo's breathless letters to Leiden, one can hear his deep sigh of relief saying, "You see, mother, he was not such a bad person after all. He earned the respect of people like Dr. Gachet." This feeling was so strong that Theo gave Dr. Gachet extraordinary liberty immediately after the funeral to pillageVincent's studio -- shocking for a brother who otherwise cosseted his brother's legacy in words and images. As Adeline Ravoux recounts, Dr. Gachet, with his son's help, took almost all of the works that remained in the studio immediately after the funeral: "On the way back [from the funeral] ... They entered the 'artists' room' where the coffin had been and where the canvases were exhibited. Theo, wanting to thank those who had taken care of his brother, offered to let them take as a remembrance several canvases by theartist who had just passed away. Father was happy with my portrait and that of The Town Hall of Auvers, which M. Vincent had given to him whilst alive. When the proposition was put to Dr. Gachet, he chose numerous canvases and gave them to his son, Paul: 'Roll them up, Coco,' he said, to make a package of them." (Carrié, "Recollections on Vincent van Gogh's Stay in Auvers-sur-Oise," in Stein, ed., pp. 216-217.)
In another account, Adeline's recollection of the incident has more of an edge: "M. Theo asked myfather to choose the pictures he would like, but as he already had La Mairie (The Town Hall) and my portrait, he refused. M. Theo invited Dr. Gachet to take therest. He didn't need to be asked twice and with the help of hisson rolled up canvas after canvas." (Ravoux, quoted in Gauthier, in Murger, ed., p. 413; emphasis added.)
This act, of course, gave Dr. Gachet a huge stake, bothmonetary and emotional, in Vincent's reputation, even at the same timeas Theo's emotional (and medical) needs inflated Dr. Gachet'srole. It was out of this symbiosis that Gachet's desire to write a biographical piece about Vincent --and Theo's enthusiasm for it -- quickly emerged (b2016 V/1982, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gachet, Paul", 8/12/1890). Dr. Gachet continued to be Theo's connection to Auvers -- and a salve to his conscience for not coming to visit his brother's grave (see b2015V/1982, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gachet, Paul", 9/12/1890). The unhealthy dynamicsset in motion in August 1890 were not helped by the obsessive limelight-seekingof Dr. Gachet's son Paul, also a doctor, in subsequent generations. His relentless efforts to portray his father as Vincent's most ardent, earliest fan ("No one amongst his contemporaries understood him better") left many scarson the record, although it did eventually bring a treasure-trove of Vincent's work to the Louvre beginning in 1949 (Gachet, Deux Amis des Impressionistes: Le Docteur Gachet et Murer, p. 121).
Undoubtedly the creepiest episode in this long, sad, parasitic relationship came in 1905 when the fifteen-year lease on Vincent's grave in Auvers expired and the body had to be exhumed. Gachet (fils) wrote triumphantlyof his ghoulish privilege: "In the new coffin, the bones were laid outin their respective positions, while the doctor studied the massive skull withits protruding cheekbones and eyebrow-arches. We were replaying the scene with the grave-diggers from Hamlet ... I can now reveal that I personally laid his skull at the head of the bier that, after some minutes of recollection, was then sealed and buried in its present location." (ibid.) In 1954, Gachet (fils) left a large bequest to maintain the graves of Vincent and Theo in the Auvers cemetery (see Distel and Stein, p. 23, n. 90). "After my father passed away," he wrote around the same time, "I have kept my promise to Mme [Jo] Van Gogh that no mercenary hand should play a part in the upkeep of the double grave. Were not the hands that held Vincent's skull the most suited to this care?" (Gachet, Souvenirs de Cézanne et de van Gogh à Auvers, p. 8.)
And the book project was clearly launched: "I am glad to hear that you now have all the additional information you need to make, not a catalogue but a complete biography -- for a man who was so exceptional something commonplace would be inappropriate" (ibid.). By August 22, when Jo wrote her parents about a dinner with Gachet, she reported that the doctor was "working on a biography" (b4307 V/1984, "Gogh-Bonger, Jo van" to "Bonger, H.C. en H.L.", 8/22/1890). Theo reported on the same dinner to his mother and sister: "We had Dr. Gachet over for dinner last Wednesday [August 20]. I will send you a letter for you to read his opinion.He became ill from the emotion after the funeral but was somewhat better then. He wrote (the article) about Vincent when he was ill and in a while he will publish it in a journal. It can be good. Aurier is not home yet." (b0936 V/1962, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gogh-Carbentus, Anna C. van en Gogh, Willemina van", 8/24/1890.) The last sentence shows that Theo's thinking had already moved on to a more ambitious plan for a biographical tribute to his dead brother. While he continued to encourage Gachet's efforts, he began a separate negotiation with the critic Albert Aurier only a week after his dinner with Gachet.
On September 12, Theo reported to Gachet: "As for the exhibition, I saw Durand-Ruel, senior, who came by my house and found the drawings and several paintings 'very interesting'; this was his expression. But when I spoke of the exhibition, he told me that the public would hold him forever responsible if anybody were to laugh, so he was postponing his decision until he had seen the canvases at Tanguy's. He promised to come and get me the following week, but he didn't show up."(b2015 V/1982, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gachet, Paul", 9/12/1890.) Theo continued to pursue the cause with Durand-Ruel fils (Charles Durand-Ruel and Georges Durand-Ruel, sons of Paul Durand-Ruel who were French art dealers): "Later, I saw the son, who told me that he didn't think his father was reluctant and that in the winter he would have no objection to lending the gallery for this purpose" (ibid.). But one can hear his discouragement as he begins to contemplate alternative scenarios: "Which seems preferable to you, the exhibition with the Durand-Ruels (or) if we could get it, a separate room in the Paris pavilion at the Independents exhibition?" (b2015 V/1982, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gachet, Paul", 9/12/1890; quoted in Gachet, Deux Amis des Impressionistes: Le Docteur Gachet et Murer, p. 125).
By the end of September, the plan for an exhibition of Vincent's work by Durand-Ruel was definitively dead, as Theo informed Pissarro: "As for the exhibition of my brother's works, the latest news is that it will not take place at Durand[-Ruel's]. He does not see any financial benefit in it, thus it would only be some [adverse] public opinions that he would have to listen to." ("Gogh, Theo van" to "Pissarro, Camille", 9/30/1890; quoted in Rewald, Studies in Post-Impressionism, p. 68). But Theo was entertaining yet more options: "I am going to try to hold the exhibition at the Theatre d'Application where Cheret and Renouard exhibited. Let us hope it's feasible." (ibid.)
Rewald offers a marvelous explanation of Durand-Ruel's refusal to sponsor a memorial retrospective of Vincent's art: "Durand-Ruel's position was indeed somewhat awkward.Theo was, after all, a competitor who, despite restricted means, had managed to become friendly and do business with some of 'his' artists, especially the most successful ones, Monet and Degas; besides, Vincent's style could hardly appeal to the man who had barely succeeded in imposing the Impressionist vision. Durand-Ruel was at that moment trying to reconcile himself with the various painters who had left his fold and at the same time take advantage of improved economic conditions. He was preparing the first issue of a periodical supporting the Impressionists, on whose behalf he now deployed a more confident activity both in France and the United States. He had at last re-established commercial contacts with Monet who, without abandoning Boussod & Valadon, promised to exhibit his series of haystacks in Durand-Ruel's gallery." (Rewald, Studies in Post-Impressionism, p. 68.)
When it came to his medical care, Theo's denial took more direct, more practiced forms.On September 8, only a month before his emergency admission to the hospital, he wrote his mother: "Jo is getting stronger and looks well. Luckily her toothache is over. As far as I am concerned, I am getting better too. Every day I take the drops that Dr. Van der Maaten has prescribed; I sleep better and the coughing has almost stopped. The lovely weather helps a lot. So we have every reason to be content." (b0937 V/1962, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gogh-Carbentus, Anna C. van", 9/8/1890; quoted in Hulsker, Vincent and Theo: A Dual Biography, p. 451).
On September 16, Theo wrote his mother again, telling her that his problem "is mainly in my head, I think it must be my nerves that still make me feel so wretched sometimes, and make it so difficult for me to do even the easiest work which involves using your brain" (b0938 V/1962, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gogh-Carbentus, Anna C. van", 9/16/1890; quoted in Jansen and Robert, p. 47). On September 27, he wrote to his sister Wil, blaming all his worst problems on the cough medicine Dr. Van der Maaten had given him ("I had become so sick by the drops of that Dr. that I would have become insane") and reassuring her that the doctors had told him, "'If you would stay home it would be good for your coughing, but your nervousness would come back.' No need to tell you that I listened to him, and I now feel much better" (b0947 V/1962, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gogh, Willemina van", 9/27/1890; quoted in Hulsker, Vincent and Theo: A Dual Biography, p. 451). Two weeks later, he was admitted to the hospital.
Theo also practiced a more modern, nuanced form of medical denial: doctor-shopping. In the brief two months between his return to Paris from Holland and his admission to the hospital, he mentions seeing a number of doctors, including Dr. Van der Maaten, Dr. Gachet, and Dr. Léon Simon (no dates), all, presumably, while he continued to see his regular doctors, Dr. Rivet and Dr. Gruby (ibid.). Even with his doctors, however, his default mode was denial. On September 12, he wrote Dr. Gachet: "The thing is that my health is still not good, my head spins and every time I write I feel quite nauseous. [But] my nerves still have the upper hand."(b2015 V/1982, "Gogh, Theo van" to "Gachet, Paul", 9/12/1890.)
Context:
JLB 740, 1/22/1889: "I believe I've run fairly parallel to Van Eeden in this, and consequently don't regard his style of writing as unparallel to my style of painting in the matter of colour."
The petition was granted, but apparently only on a temporary basis, as Jo's father had to return to the court less than a month later to request an extension of Theo's commitment "for a period of one year." This second petition was supported by the staff of the asylum: "Respectfully makes it known, Hendrik Christiaan Bonger, residing in Amsterdam, That his son in law Theodorus van Gogh, At the authorization of the County Judge in Amsterdam on the 17th of November 1890 has been admitted temporarily into the Geneeskundig Gesticht voor Krankzinnigen in Utrecht. That according to the attached declaration of the medical professional of this institute dated December 9, 1890, continued care for this insane is necessary. For which reason the requestor respectfully requests: that it may please the Court to authorize the mentioned Unlucky to remain in an Institute for the Insane in this country for the time of one year."
Albert Aurier (another potential attendee at a funeral) published a short notice in the Mercure de France in March of 1891: "We learn of the death of Theo van Gogh, the sympathetic and intelligent expert who worked so diligently to acquaint the public with the works of the independent and most audacious artists of today!" (quoted in Rewald, Studies in Post-Impressionism, pp. 72-73). This imputation of a campaign of public silence in no way minimizes Jo's private grief. On the first anniversary of Theo's death, she visited the grave in Utrecht and entered this note in her diary: "I went back to the spot where he rests -- a ray of sunshine caught the roses I had left, the same sort of rose he gave me when we had been married for just one day" (Jo Bonger diary, entry of 1/28/1892; quoted in Stolwijk and Thomson, p. 57).
Context:
BVG 317,
8/22/1883-8/23/1883: "Then she says openly, 'Yes, I am
careless and lazy, and I have always been that way, and it can't be
helped,' or 'Yes, it's
true I'm a whore, and the only end for me will be to drown myself.'"
JLB 379, 8/23/1883-8/29/1883: "Then she says
frankly, well, yes, I am indifferent and lazy, and I always have been and there's
nothing to be done about it -- or, well, yes,
I'm a whore, or 'it's bound to end up with me
jumping into the water.'"
